ارزیابی آزمایشگاهی ضریب دبی سازه ترکیبی کالورت-سرریز کلید پیانویی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکدة فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه شهید اشرفی اصفهانی، اصفهان

2 .فارغ‌التحصیل کارشناسی ارشد گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکدة فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه شهید اشرفی اصفهانی، اصفهان.

چکیده

سازه هیدرولیکی ترکیبی کالورت-سرریز در شرایطی که امکان عبور جریان از زیر سازه و همچنین روگذری آن فراهم باشد بعنوان یکی از راه کارهای پیشنهادی جهت گذردهی سریعتر جریان آب و رسوب مطرح است. انتخاب سرریز مناسب برای تأمین این هدف از اهمیت زیادی برخوردار‌است. در این تحقیق از سرریز کلید پیانویی به دلیل گذردهی بالای آن، به‌عنوان سرریز این سازه ترکیبی استفاده ‌شده است. برای این منظور مدل‌های آزمایشگاهی کالورت-سرریز کلیدپیانویی با متغیر در نظر گرفتن ارتفاع و طول سرریز و همچنین ارتفاع بازشدگی‌های متفاوت برای کالورت مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. علاوه بر آن عملکرد هر یک از سازه‌های کالورت و سرریز کلیدپیانویی بررسی گردید و با سازه ترکیبی مورد مقایسه قرارگرفت. آزمایش‌ها، در محدوده دبی 5 تا 50 لیتر بر ثانیه، برای سازه سرریز کلید پیانویی، کالورت و کالورت-سرریز در شرایط جریان آزاد انجام‌ شد. نتایج نشان داد با تغییر 50 % در ارتفاع و 63 %در عرض سرریز گذردهی جریان به ترتیب 25 % و 12.5 % افزایش می-یابد بنابراین تاثیر ارتفاع نسبت به عرض سرریز بر میزان گذردهی جریان بیشتر است. این در حالی است که در سازه ترکیبی تاثیر بازشدگی کالورت بیش از ارتفاع سرریز است. با توجه به نتایج، سازه ترکیبی کالورت-سرریز نسبت به هریک از سازه‌های سرریز کلید پیانویی و کالورت در حدود 10 درصد راندمان بالاتری دارد. در سرریز کلید پیانویی تغییرات ضریب دبی با نسبت بدون بعد هد به ارتفاع سرریز کاهشی و در سازه ترکیبی این روند افزایشی است؛ بنابراین در شرایطی که دبی جریان زیاد است و امکان استفاده از سرریز کلیدپیانویی با ارتفاع بلند وجود ندارد سازه ترکیبی کالورت-سرریز کلید پیانویی با ارتفاع کمتر گزینه مناسبی خواهد بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Experimental evaluation of discharge coefficient of the combined culvert-piano key weir

نویسندگان [English]

  • Elham Izadinia 1
  • mozhdeh omidvar 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Ashrafi Esfahani University, Isfahan, Iran.
2 .Graduated student, Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Ashrafi Esfahani University, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introductions
Increasing demand for water has challenged governments to manage water resources by optimizing and designing highly efficient hydraulic systems. One common water-management device is the weir which is used to modify the water-flow within rivers. Existing weirs are not typically responsive to water demand. Consequently, it would be advantageous if the water supply from these structures could be modified to meet fluctuating water demand. Therefore, new structures could replace existing structures or modifications could be made to current weirs to achieve this desired control. Candidate changes could include an extension of the weir crown or an opening up of the weir body to modify the flow. When the flow can pass over and under the structure, one of the proposed options is a combined culvert-weir, which also increases the sediment and flow rate. Choosing the appropriate overflow to achieve this goal is very important. In this research, the piano key weir has been used as the overflow of this combined structure due to its high performance. The innovative shape of a non-rectilinear weir, known as the Piano-Key weir PKW, increases the total effective crest length, escalating the discharge capacity of the weir. A PKW is a modified form of a labyrinth weir with the specific geometrical characteristics including inlet and outlet overhangs or inclined inlet and outlet keys floors, forming a new set of variables.

Methods
The experiments have been performed in hydraulic laboratory of Shahid Ashrafi Esfahani University. The tests were conducted in a rectangular channel with 10 m long, 0.6 m wide, and 0.75 m high. Models were built with galvanized sheet with 0.9 mm thickness. Laboratory models of the combined culvert-weir were examined by considering the varied height and length of the overflow, as well as the different openings for culverts. In addition, the performance of the culvert and piano key weir was investigated and compared with the combined structure. Experiments had been done in free flow conditions and in discharge range of 5 to 50 lit/s, for piano key weirs, culverts and combined culvert-weir structures. The geometry parameters of models are shown in Table (1) (Refer to fulltext of the paper).

Results
The results indicated that in the PKW the discharge 25% and 12.5% is increased with %50 and 63% increasing in height and width of the weir respectively. Thus, the effect of the height on increasing the discharge of the weir is more considerable. In combined structures the effects of culvert opening are more than weir height. The results show that for a specific head, the discharge of combined structure is greater than the discharge of weir and culvert and the efficiency of combined structure is approximately 10% more than culvert and weir.
The results showed that in piano key weirs, the discharge coefficient decreases with the dimensionless ratio of head to the weir height and in the combined structure, this trend is increasing. Therefore, in situations where the flow rate is high and it is not possible to use a high piano key weir, a combined culvert-weir is a good option.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Discharge coefficient
  • Head-discharge curve
  • Culvert
  • Piano key weir
  • Ansar M. Alexis A. and Damisse E. 2002. Flow computations at Kissimmee River gated structures: A comparative study. Rep., Hydrology and Hydraulics Dept., South Florida Water Management District, Fla. .
  • Anderson R. 2011. Piano Key Weir Head Discharge Relationships. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 880. Utah State University. 80 p.
  • Bodhaine G. L. 1976. Measurment of peak discharge at culverts by indirect methods. Government Printing Office, US Geological Survey, Washington (DC). 69 p.
  • Dasika B. 1995. New approach to design of culverts. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 121(3): 261-264.
  • Esmayilvandi M. and Asadi-Aghbolaghi M. 2019. Experimental Study of Discharge Coefficient of Broad Crest Weir-Circular Culvert Combined Structure. Ferdowsi Civil Engineering. 32(2): 45-60.
  • Ghaderi A. Daneshfaraz R. Dasineh M. and Di Francesco S. 2020. Energy dissipation and hydraulics of flow over trapezoidal–triangular labyrinth weirs. Water 12(7): 1992.
  • Guven A. Hassan M. and Sabir S.H. 2013. Experimental investion on discharge coeffient for combined broad creste weir-box culvert structure. Journal of Hydrology, 500: 97-103.
  • Hager W. and Del Giudice G. 1998. Generalized culvert design diagram. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineerig. 124(5): 271–274.
  • Henderson F.M. 1966. Open channel flow. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Hien T. C. Son H. T. and Khanh M. H. T. 2006. Results of some piano keys weir hydraulic model tests in Vietnam, Proc. 22nd ICOLD Congress, CIGB/ICOLD, Barcelona. Q87(R39). 581-596.
  • Johnson P. A. and Brown E. R. 2000. Stream assessment for multicell culvert use. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 126(5): 381-386.
  • Kabiri-Samani A. and Javaheri A. 2012. Discharge coefficients for free and submerged flow over Piano Key weirs. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 50(1): 114-120.
  • Machiels O. Pirotton M. Pierre A. Dewals B. and Erpicum S. 2014. Experimental parametric study and design of Piano Key Weirs. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 52(3): 326-335.
  • Meselhe E. A. and Hebert K. 2007. Laboratory Measurements of Flow through Culverts. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 133(8): 973-976.
  • Montes J. S. 1997. Discussion of New approach to design of culverts. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 123(1): 71-72.
  • Noseda M. Stojnic I. Pfister M. and Schleiss A. J. 2019. Upstream erosion and sediment passage at piano key weirs. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 145(8): 04019029.
  • Novak P. and Cabelka J. 1981. Models in hydraulic engineering. Pitman, London, UK.
  • Safarzadeh A. and Noroozi B. 2017. 3D Hydrodynamics of Trapezoidal Piano Key Spillways. International Journal of Civil Engineering. 15(1): 89-101.
  • Suprapto M. 2013. Increase spillway capacity using Labyrinth Weir. Procedia Engineering. 54: 440-446.
  • Tullis B. P. Crookston B. M. and Young N. 2020. Scale effects in free-flow nonlinear weir head-discharge relationships. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 146(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001661.