Iranian Water Research Journal

Iranian Water Research Journal

Agricultural drought monitoring and assessment using single and multiple indicators based on remote sensing data (case study of Tehran)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Hadi Siasar
Mahboobeh Ebrahimi
Department of Agircultural, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/iwrj.2025.15218.2687
Abstract
Introduction:
In recent decades, population growth, urbanization, and climate change have increased pressure on water resources, making drought a major crisis in cities like Tehran. Tehran’s semi-arid climate and geography lead to frequent droughts that reduce the quality of life and threaten sustainable development. Hydrological and meteorological indices, especially the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), based on recorded precipitation remain the standard for estimating drought over various timescales, enabling short and long term forecasts. Although short statistical periods limit analyses, they are standard in remote sensing and do not compromise accuracy. Reliable drought assessment requires high quality ground data; scarcity or errors can skew drought timing, severity, and impact estimates. This study validates Google Earth Engine satellite data against ground SPI measurements (r = 0.29) and applies pixel-level analysis to retain spatial detail. Building on composite indicator findings from urban contexts, the current study has addressed research gaps in Tehran by deriving drought indices via remote sensing. These cost effective, repeatable, and scalable methods could overcome meteorological data limitations and link meteorological drought to vegetation health indicators.
Methods:
This study evaluates drought indicators in Tehran by integrating remote sensing and meteorological data from January 2000 to December 2022, covering a 23-year period to approach the recommended 30-year climatological baseline. The meteorological data includes precipitation from local stations and NASA''s GPM product, as well as soil moisture data from the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) and local monitoring networks. The Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) was calculated using rainfall data at six temporal scales (1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months) to quantify meteorological drought and serve as a reference for evaluating remote sensing indicators. Satellite-derived variables were accessed via Google Earth Engine, including the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and land surface temperature (LST), both of which were corrected for atmospheric and geometric distortions. Monthly NDVI composites were created to align with meteorological data, facilitating the analysis of vegetation dynamics and temperature variations in Tehran. The datasets were co-registered to a common 1 km grid for pixel-level analysis, allowing for a direct comparison between SPI and remote sensing indices. This comprehensive framework enhances our understanding of urban drought monitoring by evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of both meteorological and remote sensing methods. The findings offer beneficial perspectives on urban planning and environmental management, assisting stakeholders in making informed decisions about drought response and resource management in Tehran.
Results:






نسخه پیش نویس





The analysis of composite drought indices across various timescales (monthly, seasonal, and annual) ed significant sensitivities and patterns in response to climate variability. Monthly fluctuations in these indices highlighted their responsiveness to short-term changes, with the Vegetation Health Index (VHI) ranging from 47% in 2022 to 65% in 2020. Such variations may indicated vegetation stress stemming from rising temperatures, alterations in irrigation, or changes in water management practices. Similarly, the Standardized Drought Condition Index (SDCI) exhibited sharp shifts between 20% and 70%, reflecting rapid transitions between wet and dry periods, a trend also observed in other composite indicators. At the seasonal level, distinct cycles were apparent. The Optimized Vegetation Drought Index (OVDI), which aligns with plant growth patterns, peaked in spring and summer while declining in autumn and winter. The SDCI also displayed seasonal patterns but with greater year-to-year variability, suggesting that meteorological factors can diverge from vegetation responses. This divergence underscores the influence of sudden weather changes, such as unexpected droughts or heavy rainfall, on how vegetation adapttions. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing effective agricultural strategies and managing water resources in the context of climate change. On an annual scale, long-term trends came into focus. From 2000 to 2012, the SDCI showed a slight downward trend, indicating a prolonged drought, before gradually improving. In contrast, the OVDI has been steadily increasing since 2012, suggesting vegetation recovery and improved hydrological conditions. Comparing these indices highlights the complex nature of drought, revealing instances where vegetation-focused metrics diverge from those based on meteorological data.
Conclusion:
The temporal trend of droughts periodic patterns, with the years 2000–2002 classified mainly as the moderate drought category, while 2003–2006 showed a relative improvement and a trend towards mild or no drought conditions. The return to moderate to severe droughts in 2007–2010, followed by a gradual improvement from 2011 to 2020 (with exceptions such as 2013 and 2015, which experienced moderate droughts), emphasizes the need for continuous monitoring. On a monthly and seasonal scale, the months of February, July, and November, and the summer season, showed the highest drought intensity, while April and October, and the winter season, were more favorable. Mann-Kendall trend analysis revealed that SDCI showed significant decreasing trends at seasonal (P=0.049) and annual (P=0.018) scales, indicating drought intensification. Conversely, vegetation indices (VCI, VHI, NDVI) exhibited significant increasing trends, suggesting vegetation recovery despite meteorological drought conditions.Correlation analysis also highlighted the pivotal role of composite indices. These indices not only had strong correlations with independent factors (such as precipitation and vegetation), but also provided the ability to accurately reflect changes at different time scales. Precipitation indices such as SPI and PCI, with their perfect correlation, are ideal tools for assessing droughts caused by rainfall deficiency, while the role of temperature (exacerbation) and vegetation (modification) emphasizes the importance of a multidimensional approach.
Keywords
Drought
OVDI
SDCI
Tehran
VHI
1. Almeida, C. and Landsberg, J.J., 2003. Evaluating methods of estimating global radiation and vapor pressure deficit using a dense network of automatic weather stations in coastal Brazil. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 118(3-4), pp. 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S01681923(03)00122-9
 
2.    Chen, D., Hu, H., Liao, C., Ye, J.,  Bao, W., Mo, J., et al., 2023. Crop NDVI time series construction by fusing Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and environmental data with an ensemble-based framework, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 215(c), pp.108388. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108388
 
3.     Du, L., Tian, Q., Yu, T., Meng, Q., Jancso, T., Udvardy, P., et al., 2013. A comprehensive drought monitoring method integrating MODIS and TRMM data, International, Journal of Applied Earth Observation and geoinformation, 23(A), pp. 245-253, DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2012.09.010
 
4.  Dutta, D., Kundu, A., Patel, N.R., Saha, S.K.,  and Siddiqui, A.R., 2015. Assessment of  agricultural drought in Rajasthan (India) using remote sensing derived Vegetation Condition Index (VCI) and Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18(1), pp.53–63. httpt.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.03.006
 
5.  Hao, C., Zhang, J. and Yao, F., 2015. Combination of multi-sensor remote sensing data for drought monitoring over Southwest China. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 35(B), pp. 270-283. Doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2014.09.011.
 
6.  Hosseini, N., Ghorbanpour, M. and Mostafavi, H., 2024. Habitat potential modelling and the effect of climate change on the current and future distribution of three Thymus species in Iran using MaxEnt. Scientific Reports, 14, 3641. Doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53405-5.
 
7. Huete, A. R., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., and Ferreira, L. G., 2002. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1-2), pp.195-213. DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2
 
8. Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Nelkin, E. J., Wolff, D. B., Adler, R. F., Gu, G., et al., 2007. The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 8(1), pp.38-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM560.1
 
9. Jalili, S., 2005. Comparison of satellite and meteorological indicators in drought monitoring (case study of Tehran province) supervised by Morid Saeed, Master's thesis, Tarbiat Modares University )Inparsian). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.2008479.1388.39.1.8.7
 
10. Kogan, F.N., 1997. Global drought watch from space. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78(4), pp.621-636. https://Doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078%3C0621:GDWFS%3E2.0.CO;2
 
11. Kogan, F. N., 1995. Application of vegetation index and brightness temperature for drought detection. Advances in Space Research, 15(11), pp.91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(95)00079-T
 
12. Kogan, F., 2022. New Remote Sensing Vegetation Health Technology. In: Remote Sensing Land Surface Changes. Springer, Cham. pp. 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96810-6_5
 
13. McKee, T.B., Doesken, N.J. and Kleist, J., 1993. The Relationship of Drought Frequency and Duration to Time Scales. 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, Anaheim, California, The U.S.A., pp, 179-184.
 
14. Owe, M., R. de Jeu, and Holmes, T., 2008. Multisensor historical climatology of satellite-derived global land surface moisture, Journal of Geophyscal Research, 113(F), pp.01002. https:// doi:10.1029/2007JF000769
 
15. Pokhrel, Y., Felfelani, F., Satoh, Y., Boulange, J., Burek, P., Gädeke, et al.,  2021. Global terrestrial water storage and drought severity under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 11(3), 226-233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00972-w
 
16. Rhee, J., Im, J., and Carbone, G. J., 2010. Monitoring agricultural drought for arid and humid regions using multi-sensor remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(12), 2875-2887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.005
 
17. Rodell, M., Houser, P. R., Jambor, U., Gottschalck, J., Mitchell, K., Meng, C.-J., et al., 2004. The global land data assimilation system. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 85(3), pp. 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-85-3-381
 
18. Rostami, A., Bazaneh, M., Raeini M., 2017. Spatial and temporal monitoring of agricultural drought using MODIS sensor images and remote sensing technology (case study: East Azerbaijan province). Soil and Water Science. 27(3), pp.213-226.[In parsian] https://doi.org/10.22092/ijwmse.2020.126860.1684
 
19. Seiler, R. A., Kogan, F., and Sullivan, J., 1998. AVHRR-based vegetation and temperature condition indices for drought detection in Argentina. Advances in Space Research., 21(3), pp.481-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00884-3
 
20. Siasar, H., Mohammad Rezapour, U., Khodamoradpour, M., 2024. Drought monitoring using MODIS sensor data and comparison with SPI meteorological index in short-term periods, case study: Golestan province, Journal of Geography and Development, 22(74), pp. 166-186. [In parsian] https://doi: 10.22111/gdij.2024.8175
 
21. Wan, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q. and Li, Z. L., 2002. Validation of the land-surface temperature products retrieved from Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1-2), pp.163-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00093-7
 
22.   Wassie, S.B., Mengistu, D.A. and Berlie, A.B., 2022. Trends and spatiotemporal patterns of meteorological drought incidence in North Wollo, northeastern highlands of Ethiopia. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15(12), p.1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10423-9
 
23. Wei, W., Zhang, J., Zhou, L., Xie, B., Zhou, J., Li, C., 2021. Comparative evaluation of drought indices for monitoring drought based on remote sensing data, Environmental Science and Pollution Reseach Internatinal. 28, pp, 20408–20425.doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12120-0.
 
24. Zhang, A., and Jia, G., 2013. Monitoring meteorological drought in semiarid regions using multi-sensor microwave remote sensing data, Remote Sensing of Environment, (134), pp.12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.023
 
25. Zhang, J., Mu, Q., Huang, J., 2016. Assessing the remotely sensed Drought Severity Index for agricultural drought monitoring and impact analysis in North China, Ecological Indicators, (63), pp. 296-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.062.
 
26- Zhao, X., Xia, H., Pan, L., Song, H., Niu, W., Wang, R., et al.. (2021).  Drought Monitoring over Yellow River Basin from 2003–2019 Using Reconstructed MODIS Land Surface Temperature in Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing, 13(18), pp.37-48, doi.org/10.3390/rs13183748
 

  • Receive Date 24 May 2025
  • Accept Date 09 August 2025
  • Publish Date 23 October 2025