Iranian Water Research Journal

Iranian Water Research Journal

The Effect of Different Numbers of Flow Splitters on Energy Loss in a Piano Key Weir

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Sanaz Poursakhi 1
Ali Khoshfetrat 2
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
2 , Department of Civil Engineering, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
10.22034/iwrj.2025.15174.2676
Abstract
Introduction:
Piano key weirs have rectangular, triangular, and trapezoidal shapes in terms of plan and are presented in four types A, B, C, and D. Piano key weirs are the evolution of nonlinear weirs with high efficiency; therefore, it is essential to study the flow energy loss and the methods to increase it. In the present study the first time, various numbers of flow splitters were used in the trapezoidal piano key weir of type B to increase the flow energy loss. Also, two weirs with heights of 0.20 and 0.18 m were used. The flow splitters were cylindrical and are six, four, and two in each cycle.
Methods:
The experiments were conducted in a channel with 10 m length, 0.8 m width, and 1 m height. The slope of the channel was zero. Water temperature varied between 8 and 13°C. The flow was recharged into the tank by a pump, a 10,000 m3 underground tank, and a monitor. The pump had 0.01% error. Because the velocity profiles coincided at 3.5, 0.4, and 4.5 m from the beginning of the channel coincide, a weir was installed at a distance of 5.5 m from the start of the channel. The flow rates varied between 0.02 and 0.05 m3/s. Three ultrasonic sensors were used to measure the flow depth. The first sensor was installed at a distance of 2P upstream of the weir relative to its center, and the second sensor was positioned 8P downstream of the weir to record the flow depth. Two type B trapezoidal piano key weirs were used with constant geometry but different heights of 0.20 and 0.18 m. The width of the weir inlet keys (Wi) and outlet keys (Wo) was 0.215 m and 0.075 m respectively. The length of the weir side walls (B*) and the length of the upstream overhanging edges of the weirs (Bi) was 0.40 m and 0.15 m, respectively. The length of the weir crest (L) was 3.27 m, and the thickness of the weir (Ts) was 0.01 m.
Results:
The flow splitters act as a barrier and divert the upstream flow; increasing the water level upstream of the weir. The splitters also divide the water flow and enhance aeration at the inlet keys. By the results of this research, as the number of blades increased, the water flow became more distributed and more aeration occurred at the keys. In the last row of blades (downstream of the weir), the degree of flow separation was more significant. In the weir with a greater height, the energy loss was higher and mixing of the flow near the weir toe was more intense; therefore, the flow was transferred downstream with a slower velocity. For weirs without flow splitters, the discharge coefficient in the 0.20 m high weir was obtained about 5.60% lower than that of the 0.18 m high weir. Also, the discharge coefficient in the weir with six, four, and two flow splitters per cycle was about 6.80, 1.97, and 0.50% lower, respectively, compared with the 0.20 m height weir without blades. In the weir with a height of 0.20 m compared to the weir with a height of 0.18 m, both without flow splitters, the flow energy loss was reduced by about 8.52%. Also, in weirs with a height of 0.20 meters with six, four, and two flow splitters, the flow energy loss was about 5.06, 3.07, and 1.45 percent higher, respectively, comparing the weirs with the same height and without flow splitters.
Conclusion:
Investigation of flow energy loss in piano key weirs is of interest and importance due to their high efficiency in the flow passage. In the present study, flow energy loss was researched in a trapezoidal piano key weir type B, with and without varying numbers of flow splitters. Dimensional analysis was also used to extend the results to other weirs and different types of piano key weirs in channels. The key findings of the current study are as follows: (1) Increasing the number of flow splitters (thereby reducing the effective length of the weir crest) led to a decrease in the discharge coefficient and increase in the flow energy loss. (2) Increasing the height of the weir resulted in a higher discharge coefficient, and reduced the flow energy loss. (3) The presence of splitters shifted the flow farther from the weir toe and reduced the specific energy downstream. (4) Increasing values of Hu/P and Le/P, the flow energy loss decreased. (5) A relationship was developed to calculate the flow energy loss with a correlation coefficient of 99.91%
Keywords
Weir height
Relative energy
Trapezoidal
Discharge coefficient
Type B
1- Abdi Chooplou, C., Kahrizi, E., Fathi, A., Ghodsian, M. and Latifi, M., 2024. Baffle-Enhanced Scour Mitigation in Rectangular and Trapezoidal Piano Key Weirs: An Experimental and Machine Learning Investigation. Water, 16(15), p.2133. DOI: 10.3390/w16152133
 
2. Al-Shukur, A.H.K. and Al-Khafaji, G.H., 2018. Experimental study of the hydraulic performance of piano key weir. International Journal of Energy and Environment, 9(1), pp.63-70.
 
3. Babakhah, L. and Khoshfetrat, A., 2024. Investigating local scour downstream of Piano key weir with Riprap. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 9(11), pp.1-15. DOI: 10.1007/s41062-024-01759-0
 
4. Bansal, N., Singh, D. and Kumar, M., 2023. Computation of energy across the type-C piano key weir using gene expression programming and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. Energy Reports, 9, pp.310-321. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.04.003
 
5. Bodaghi E, Abdi Chooplou Ch, Ghodsian M., 2024. Experimental investigation of scour downstream of a type A trapezoidal piano key weir under free and submerged flow conditions. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics., 71. DOI: 10.2478/johh-2023-0041
 
6. Crookston, B.M., Erpicum, S., Tullis, B.P. and Laugier, F., 2019. Hydraulics of labyrinth and piano key weirs: 100 years of prototype structures, advancements, and future research needs. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 145(12), p.02519004. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001646
 
7. Ehsanifar, A., Ghodsian, M. and Abdi Chooplou, C., 2023. The experimental study of the effect of splitter on the flow discharge Piano key weir. Journal of Hydraulics, 18(2), pp.39-52. DOI: 10.30482/jhyd.2022.330734.1591
 
8. Eslinger, K. R. and Crookston, B.M., 2020. Energy dissipation of type a piano key weirs. Water, 12(5), p.1253. DOI: 10.3390/w12051253
 
9. Fathi, A., Khoshfetrat, A. and Alavi, S.H., 2025. Downstream Local Scour of PKW with Different Shapes and Numbers of Flow Splitters. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 151(4), p.04025015. DOI: 10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-1414
 
10. Fathi, A., Abdi Chooplou, Ch. and Ghodsian, M. 2024. Local scour downstream of type-A trapezoidal stepped piano key weir in sand and gravel sediments. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/09715010.2024.2353612
 
11. Fathi, A., Abdi Chooplou, Ch. and Ghodsian, M., 2023. An Experimental Study of Flow Energy Loss in Trapezoidal Stepped Piano Key Weirs (PKWs). Modares Civil Engineering journal, 23(4), pp.163-174. DOI: 10.22034/23.4.163
 
12. Karimi, M., Jalili Ghazizadeh, M., Saneie, M. and Attari, J., 2020. Experimental and numerical study of a piano key side weir with oblique keys. Water and Environment journal, 34, pp.444-453. DOI: 10.1111/wej.12544
 
13. Karimi, M., Attari, J., Saneie, M. and Jalili Ghazizadeh, M.R., 2018. Side weir flow characteristics: comparison of piano key, labyrinth, and linear types. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 144(12), p.04018075. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001539
 
14. Khanh, M.H.T., Hien, T.C. and Quat, D.S., (2011-2014). Study and construction of PK Weirs in Vietnam.https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Study-and-construction-of-PK-Weirs-in-Vietnam-%28-to-Khanh-Hien/
 
15. Khoshfetrat, A., Challoob Mshali, K. and Fathi, A., 2025. Experimental study of the effect of jump on the scour downstream of type-C trapezoidal piano key weir. Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering, 56(11), pp.1353-1368. DOI: 10.22060/ceej.2024.22565.7996
 
16. Mirkhorli, P., Ghaderi, A., MohammadNezhad, H., Mohammadi, M. and Kisi, O., 2025. Hydraulic Behavior and Energy Dissipation in Piano Key Weirs vs. Rectangular Labyrinth Weirs: A Comparative Study. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, p.102830. DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2025.102830
 
17. Pfster M, Jüstrich S, Schleiss AJ., 2017. Toe-scour formation at piano key weirs. CRC Press, Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs III, pp 147–156
 
18. Pinto, M., Matos, J.D.S.G. and dos Santos Viseu, M.T.F., 2017. Energy dissipation on stepped spillways with a piano key weir: experimental study. Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon (in Portuguese), pp.1-11.
19. Rdhaiwi, A.Q., Khoshfetrat, A. and Fathi, A., 2024. Experimental comparison of flow energy loss in type-B and-C trapezoidal piano key weirs. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 28(1), pp.55-64. DOI: 10.31272/jeasd.28.1.4
 
20. Rdhaiwi, A.Q., Khoshfetrat, A. and Fathi, A., 2023. Experimental investigation of scour downstream of a C-Type trapezoidal piano key weir with stilling basin. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 27(6), pp.688-697. DOI: 10.31272/jeasd.27.6.2
 
21. Safarzadeh, A. & Noroozi, B., 2014. Three-dimensional hydrodynamics of arced piano key spillways. Journal of Hydraulics, 9(3), pp.61-79. DOI: 10.30482/JHYD.2014.10176
 
22. Shen, X. and Oertel, M., 2021. Comparative study of nonsymmetrical trapezoidal and rectangular piano key weirs with varying key width ratios. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 147(11), p.04021045. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001942
 
23. Shen, X. and Oertel, M., 2023. Influence of piano key weir crest shapes on flow characteristics, scale effects, and energy dissipation for in-channel application. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 149(6), p.04023010. DOI: 10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-13322
 
24. Singh, D. and Kumar, M., 2023. Effect of the inlet-to-outlet key width ratio of Piano Key Weir on its hydraulic behaviour. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 91, p.102342. DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2023.102342
 
25. Singh, D. and Kumar, M., 2022. Energy dissipation of flow over the type-B Piano Key Weir. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 83, p.102109. DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2021.102109
 
26. Torabi, H., Parsaie, A., Yonesi, H. and Mozafari, E., 2018. Energy dissipation on rough stepped spillways. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 42, pp.325-330. DOI: 10.1007/s40996-018-0092-5
 

  • Receive Date 13 April 2025
  • Accept Date 27 May 2025
  • Publish Date 22 June 2025