Iranian Water Research Journal

Iranian Water Research Journal

Assessing level of normal and sustainable managements in groundwater resources of Zanjan Province

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 University of Zanjan
2 Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS)
3 Zanjan Regional Water Company
Abstract
Introduction: Groundwater is a vital resource for human consumption, agricultural production, and the development of water-related industries, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. Groundwater and surface water resources provide approximately 60 and 40 percent of Iran’s total water supply, respectively, where the relative water consumption in the agricultural, urban, and industrial sectors is approximately 92%, 7%, and 1%, respectively. The construction of many dams on main rivers, along with water extraction, has reduced river flows, dried them up, and damaged river-dependent ecosystems. The inflow to Tashk and Bakhtegan lakes located in Fars province has decreased due to the construction of upstream dams and the use of river water for irrigation in the past decade, leading to the drying of these lakes in 2013. The over-extraction of groundwater by ~5.4 billion cubic meters per year during the 2002-2015 period has resulted in a decrease in groundwater levels (10-100 centimeters per year) in different regions of Iran, averaging 49 centimeters per year nationwide, damaging groundwater-dependent ecosystems in some areas. For example, Parishan Lake, which is mainly the result of the inflow of groundwater from nine springs, has experienced a decrease in water depth (about 5 meters during the 1995-2008 period) due to increased groundwater extraction around the wetland. The Jahrom aquifer in Fars province has also experienced a decrease in water level of approximately 0.75 meters per year, or three aquifers Aspas, Khosrowshirin, and Kamfiruz in the north of Fars province have respectively experienced a decrease in groundwater level of approximately 0.7, 1, and 0.35 meters per year due to over-extraction. Although groundwater is a vital source for human needs and consumption, it is also vital for preserving the environment. The main point in water resources management is the neglect of environmental water needs, in other words, all the water available in a river or aquifer is only considered for human consumption. However, a physical index recently presented by Naderi (2021) takes into account environmental needs and quantifies the level of water resources management based on the concepts of available water and water supply (water extraction). The aim of this study is to quantify the level of management (LOM) of aquifers in Zanjan Province under “normal” and “sustainable” management conditions



Methods: The study area includes eight alluvial aquifers of Zanjan Province (northwestern Iran) which are located between 47010’ to 5005’ E and 35025’ to 37010’ N. About 1.6% of the province’s area has a dry climate, 76% has a semi-dry climate, 20% has a Mediterranean climate, and 2.4% has a semi-humid to humid climate. The aquifers include Tarom, Zanjan, Mahneshan, Moshampa, Sojas, Zarrin-Tappeh, Abhar, and Qeydar, which have areas of 75.5, 1146.13, 30.06, 36.1, 501.7, 495.4, 657.6, and 699.2 km2, respectively. The LOM is quantified under “normal” and “sustainable” conditions. The difference between the two LOM values stems from definitions for existing groundwater sources. Sustainable groundwater originates from the aquifer’s own region, while normal groundwater originates from both the local aquifer region and adjacent groundwaters to meet the region’s water needs.

〖LOM〗_n=(〖AGW〗_n-TWS)/〖AGW〗_n (1)

〖LOM〗_s=(〖AGW〗_s-TWS)/〖AGW〗_s (2)

〖〖AGW〗_n=R〗_n-EFR=(I_p+I_r+I_s+I_irg+I_mi+I_net )-EFR (3)

〖〖AGW〗_s=R〗_s-EFR=(I_p+I_r+I_s+I_irg+I_mi )-EFR (4)

In the above relations, subscripts n and s represent normal and sustainable conditions, respectively. AGW is available groundwater, TWS total water supply, R the recharge of groundwater, EFR the environmental flow requirement, infiltration from precipitation (Ip), groundwater recharge from the river (Ir), groundwater recharge from runoff (Is), groundwater recharge due to irrigation return flow (Iirg) and municipal-industrial (Imi) water use, and net groundwater recharge from adjacent groundwaters (Inet).



Results: Alluvial aquifers of Tarom, Zanjan, Mahneshan, Moshampa, Sojas, Zarrinabad, Abhar, and Qeydar have experienced groundwater storage anomalies of 2.57, -25.61, 3.83, 0.82, -6.46, -9.52, -45.80, and -19.55 million cubic meters per year, respectively. Only the aquifers of Tarom, Mahneshan, and Moshampa have positive changes in storage volume. Results show that in the Mahneshan aquifer, normal management was positive (3 percent) but sustainable management was negative and close to zero (-0.1 percent). Therefore, the type of management is “pseudo-sustainable”. In the Moshampa aquifer, normal management was positive (2 percent) but sustainable management was negative (-9.7 percent). Therefore, the type of management is “pseudo-sustainable”. In the Tarom aquifer, normal management was positive (6.5 percent) but sustainable management was negative (-0.38 percent). Therefore, the type of management is “pseudo-sustainable”. In other aquifers, both normal and sustainable management were negative and indicative of the “mismanagement” class, so that normal and sustainable management in the Zanjan aquifer were respectively -9 and -41 percent, in the Sojas aquifer were -8.9 and -17.7 percent, in the Zarrinabad aquifer were -18.5 and -68 percent, in the Abhar aquifer were -30 and -106 percent, and in the Qeydar aquifer were -14 and -106 percent. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the status of water resource management, using various solutions such as wastewater treatment, education and increasing public awareness in optimal water consumption, reducing the cultivated area, increasing irrigation efficiency, and cultivating crops with less water demand to reduce groundwater abstraction in Zanjan Province.
Keywords
Subjects

1.       Abdinejad, P., 2011. Investigating the status of groundwater tables in important plains of Zanjan province (for proper management of groundwater resources in those areas). Second National Conference on Applied Water Resources Research, Zanjan. [In Persian].
 
2.       Ashraf, S., Nazemi, A. and AghaKouchak, A., 2021. Anthropogenic drought dominates groundwater depletion in Iran. Scientific reports, 11(1), p.9135.
 
3.       Dastjerdy, M. and Emadi, S.R., 2020. Investigating the Subsidence of Zanjan Plain and its Relationship with the Drop in the Level of Groundwater Levels using Radar Images of Envisat Satellite between 2003 and 2010. Hydrophysics, 6(1): 67-82. [In Persian].
 
4.       Ghazali, S., 2012. The relation between Parishan Lake water level and adjacent groundwater under groundwater over-exploitation.  Journal of Agricultural Economics Researches, 4: 121-135. [In Persian].
 
5.       Haghighi, A.T. and Kløve, B., 2017. Design of environmental flow regimes to maintain lakes and wetlands in regions with high seasonal irrigation demand. Ecological engineering, 100: 120-129.
 
6.       Mohammadi Arasteh, S. and Shoaei, S.M., 2020. An assessment of the effects of excessive groundwater abstraction on the quality of groundwater resources of the Zanjan Plain, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 79(523): 1-13.
 
7.       Moshir Panahi, D., Kalantari, Z., Ghajarnia, N., Seifollahi-Aghmiuni, S. and Destouni, G., 2020. Variability and change in the hydro-climate and water resources of Iran over a recent 30-year period. Scientific reports, 10: 1-9.
 
8.       Naderi, M. and Hajiketabi, M., 2023. Quantification of normal and sustainable management practices for groundwater resources: example of the arid Najafabad alluvial aquifer in Isfahan Province, Iran. Hydrogeology Journal, 31(2): 195-218.
 
9.       Naderi, M. and Raeisi, E., 2018. Management strategies of a critical aquifer under the climate change in Jahrum of South-Central Iran. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 4: 1077-1090.
 
10.   Naderi, M., 2020. Assessment of water security under climate change for the large watershed of Dorudzan Dam in southern Iran. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(5): 1553-1574.
 
11.   Naderi, M., 2021. Assessing level of water resources management based on water supply and availability concepts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 305, p.127086.
 
12.   Noori, R., Maghrebi, M., Mirchi, A., Tang, Q., Bhattarai, R., Sadegh, M., Noury, M., Haghighi, A.T., Kløve, B. and Madani, K., 2021. Anthropogenic depletion of Iran’s aquifers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118.
 
13.   Panahi, M., Misagi, F. and Asgari, P., 2018. Simulation and estimate of groundwater level fluctuations using GMS (case study: Zanjan plain). Environmental Sciences, 16(1): 1-14. [In Persian].
 
14.   Rey-Ab Consulting Engineers., 2023. Preparation of the water resources report for the water year 1397–1398 in the Lake Urmia basin. Water Resources Management Company, 3. [In Persian].
 
15.   Rodrigues, D.B., Gupta, H.V. and Mendiondo, E.M., 2014. A blue/green waterbased accounting framework for assessment of water security. Water Resources Research, 50(9): 7187-7205.
 
16.   Sadeghfam, S., Ehsanitabar, A., Khatibi, R. and Daneshfaraz, R., 2018. Investigating ‘risk’of groundwater drought occurrences by using reliability analysis. Ecological Indicators, 94: 170–184.
 
17.   Sadeghfam, S., Khatibi, R., Daneshfaraz, R. and Borhan Rashidi, H., 2020. Transforming vulnerability indexing for saltwater intrusion into risk indexing through a fuzzy catastrophe scheme. Water resources management, 34: 175-194.
 
18.   Samani, S., Moghaddam, H.K., and Zareian, M.J., 2021. Evaluating time series integrated groundwater sustainability: a case study in Salt Lake catchment, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80(17), p.603.
 
19.   Sefidroud-Gilan Consulting Engineers., 2023a. Water resources report for the Sefidroud basin and the Talesh-Anzali rivers (the Tarem-Khalkhal area). Water Resources Management Company, 5. [In Persian].
 
20.   Sefidroud-Gilan Consulting Engineers., 2023b. Water resources report for the Sefidroud basin and the Talesh-Anzali rivers (the Zanjan area). Water Resources Management Company, 5. [In Persian].
 
21.   Sefidroud-Gilan Consulting Engineers., 2023c. Water resources report for the Sefidroud basin and the Talesh-Anzali rivers (the Mahneshan-Anguran area). Water Resources Management Company, 5. [In Persian].
 
22.   Sefidroud-Gilan Consulting Engineers., 2023d. Water resources report for the Sefidroud basin and the Talesh-Anzali rivers (the Sojas area). Water Resources Management Company, 5. [In Persian].
 
23.   Sefidroud-Gilan Consulting Engineers., 2023e. Water resources report for the Sefidroud basin and the Talesh-Anzali rivers (the Goltappeh-Zarrin Abad area). Water Resources Management Company, 5. [In Persian].
 
24.   Sima, S., Rosenberg, D.E., Wurtsbaugh, W.A., Null, S.E. and Kettenring, K.M., 2021. Managing Lake Urmia, Iran for diverse restoration objectives: Moving beyond a uniform target lake level. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 35, p.100812.
 
25.   Vanham, D., Hoekstra, A.Y., Wada, Y., Bouraoui, F., De Roo, A., Mekonnen, M.M. and Bidoglio, G., 2018. Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: An evaluation of indicator 6.4. 2 “Level of water stress”. Science of the total environment, 613: 218-232.
 
26.   Woldeamlak, S.T., Batelaan, O. and De Smedt, F., 2007. Effects of climate change on the groundwater system in the Grote-Nete catchment, Belgium. Hydrogeology Journal, 15: 891-901.
 
27.   Zanjani Jam, M. and Soufi, M., 2005. Investigating the relationship between climate and aquifer regions in Zanjan province. National Erosion and Sediment Conference. [In Persian].
 
 

  • Receive Date 09 February 2024
  • Revise Date 26 April 2024
  • Accept Date 28 April 2024
  • Publish Date 21 June 2024