Iranian Water Research Journal

Iranian Water Research Journal

Comparison of the scouring of symmetrical crossing jets with single jet on cohesive bed

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Farhad Arya 1
Khosro Hoseini 1
Sayed-Farhad Mousavi 2
1 Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
2 Department of Water Engineering and Hydraulic Structures, Faculty of Civil Engineering,, Semnan University, Semnan,, Iran
10.22034/iwrj.2025.15143.2672
Abstract
Introduction:
Scour in cohesive sediment beds under hydraulic jets is a critical challenge in hydraulic engineering due to the complex interplay of jet energy and sediment properties. Cohesive beds, dominated by fine-grained clay, exhibit unique erosion resistance driven by inter-particle bonding, making scour prediction and control vital for the stability of hydraulic structures like dams and plunge pools. The novelty of this study lies in its comparative analysis of scour induced by single and symmetric crossing jets on a purely cohesive clay bed, a relatively underexplored area. Unlike previous research focusing on non-cohesive or mixed beds, this study investigates the specific effects of jet configuration, impingement angles, bed moisture, and nozzle distance on scour dimensions under controlled conditions. By examining a cohesive bed with 90% fines and 10% sand, the study addresses a critical gap in understanding scour dynamics in fine-grained sediments. The experimental findings aim to provide innovative insights into optimizing plunge pool design and developing effective scour control strategies, enhancing the resilience of hydraulic infrastructure in cohesive sediment environments.
Methods:
Experiments were conducted in a 16 m long, 1 m wide, and 0.8 m high rectangular flume with transparent plexiglas walls for direct observation of scour processes. The flume included an adjustable tailgate to maintain a 12 cm tailwater depth, and a pumping system to provide a 2 L/s steady flow rate, measured by an electromagnetic flowmeter. Circular nozzles (2.2 cm diameter for crossing jets; 3.11 cm equivalent diameter for single jets) were mounted on adjustable supports to maintain a fixed vertical angle of 85° for both single and crossing jets, with crossing angles set at 45°, 75°, and 105° for crossing jets only. The nozzle distances from the water surface were adjusted to 8, 10.5, and 13 cm. The cohesive bed, with 90% clay (illite, montmorillonite, kaolinite) and 10% fine sand, had a median particle size of 0.0126 mm, plastic limit of 20%, and liquid limit of 35%. Bed moisture contents (13%, 16%, 19%) were prepared by mixing soil with water using an electric mixer, followed by compaction in six 5 cm layers to a 30 cm thickness. A hand roller ensured uniform compaction, and a vane shear test verified bed shear strength. Scour dimensions (depth, length, width) were measured using a laser meter with 1 mm accuracy.The experiments were conducted for 180 minutes to ensure that scour had reached equilibrium. Dimensional analysis focused on scour characteristics as functions of crossing angle, moisture content, and nozzle distance, with constant flow rate, tailwater depth, and vertical jet angle.
Results:
The results revealed distinct scour patterns between single and crossing jets. Single jets, due to concentrated kinetic energy, produced deeper scour holes, with depths up to 30% greater than those from crossing jets. At a dimensionless fall height of 4.18 and 13% moisture content, single jets produced maximum scour depth. In contrast, crossing jets at 105° and 19% moisture content exhibited minimal scour, while no scour observed at higher moisture levels (16% and 19%) and a fall height of 4.18 due to increased bed resistance. Crossing jets reduced scour depth by 45–66% at 75° and up to 100% at 105° compared with single jets, attributed to energy dissipation from jet collision, which forms a radial flow with reduced shear stress. Moisture content significantly influenced scour, with a 12–55% reduction in depth and 33–40% in length as moisture increased from 13% to 19%. This reduction is attributed to the reflecting enhanced cohesion from montmorillonite clay in the bed material. Scour length followed similar trends, with single jets producing longer holes (up to 14% increase with fall height) and crossing jets reducing length by 19–100% at 105°. Width was also lower for crossing jets, with reductions of 24–100% at higher angles and moisture levels. These findings align with previous studies, confirming that increased fall height reduces relative scour depth due to energy dissipation. The study highlights the effectiveness of crossing jets in minimizing scour on cohesive beds, particularly at higher impingement angles and moisture contents, providing a basis for optimizing plunge pool designs.
Conclusion:
This study highlights the contrasting scour behaviors of single and crossing jets on cohesive sediment beds, emphasizing the role of jet configuration, bed moisture, and nozzle distance in scour dynamics. Regarding the results, single jets, with focused energy, produced deeper, longer, and wider scour holes, with maximum dimensions at 13% moisture and higher fall heights. Crossing jets, particularly at 105°, significantly reduced scour (up to 100% in depth, length, and width) due to energy dissipation, with minimal scour at 19% moisture. Increased moisture content enhanced bed cohesion, reducing scour dimensions across both jet types. These findings offer valuable insights for hydraulic engineers, enabling the design of plunge pools and spillways that mitigate scour risks in cohesive bed environments. The results advocate for the use of crossing jets in scenarios requiring scour control, particularly in high-moisture conditions. Future research should explore numerical modeling to validate these experimental outcomes and investigate additional parameters, such as varying flow rates and bed compositions, to further refine scour prediction models for cohesive sediments.
Keywords
Scouring
Cohesion bed
Crossing Jet
Single jet
1-  Ahmad, Q. and Ghani, U., 2024. Experimental investigation of local scour around inclined bridge piers on clay-sand mixed cohesive sediment bed in clear-water conditions. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, pp.1-21. doi:10.1007/s40996-024-01354-7
 
2-  Ansari, S.A., Kothyari, U.C. and Raju, K.G.R., 2003. Influence of cohesion on scour under submerged circular vertical jets. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 129(12), pp.1014-1019. 129:12(1014) doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429
 
3-  Armaghani, A., Lashkarara, B. and Akhond Ali, A.M., 2017. The process of plunge pool bed form changes by a vertical jet impinging upon non-cohesive sediment. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 40(3), pp.77-85. doi:10.22055/jise.2017.13406
 
4-  Bleninger, T., 2007. Two-phase flow and morphology modelling of sediment transport in coastal waters. PhD dissertation, ETH Zurich. doi:10.3929/ethz-a-005512345
 
5-  Chanson, H., 2004. Hydraulics of open channel flow: An introduction. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. doi:10.1016/B978-075065978-9/50008-5
 
6-  D’Agostino, V. and Ferro, V., 2004. Scour on alluvial bed downstream of grade-control structures. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 130(1), pp.24-37. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:1(24)
 
7-  Dey, S. and Raikar, R.V., 2007. Scour below a high vertical drop. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133(5), pp.564-568. 133:5(564). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429
 
8-  Deitrick, A.R., Ralston, D.K., Esposito, C.R., Baustian, M.M., Burgos, M.B., Courtois, A.J. and Nepf, H., 2024. Vegetation‐generated turbulence does not impact the erosion of natural cohesive sediment. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(14), p.e2024GL109730. doi:10.1029/2024GL109730
 
9-  Dong, C., Yu, G., Zhang, H. and Zhang, M., 2020. Scouring by submerged steady water jet vertically impinging on a cohesive bed. Ocean Engineering, 196, p.106781. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106781
 
10-               Feng, C., Kong, L., Wang, Y., Li, K. and Gao, Y., 2024. Numerical simulation of cohesive bed impinging by submerged pulsed and continuous waterjet based on SPH algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 314, p.119720. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119720
 
11-               Lee, J. and Choi, H., 2022. Scour mechanisms induced by submerged cross jets on cohesive sediment beds. International Journal of Sediment Research, 37(3), pp.201-215. doi:10.1016/j.ijsrc.2021.10.005
 
12-               Mazurek, K.A., Rajaratnam, N. and Sego, D.C., 2001. Scour of cohesive soil by submerged circular turbulent impinging jets. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 127(7), pp.598-606. 127:7(598) doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429
 
13-               Melville, B.W. and Chiew, Y.M., 1999. Time scale for local scour at bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 125(1), pp.59-65. 125:1(59). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429
 
14-               Mirzaee, R., Mohammadi, M., Mousavi, S.F., Bagherzadeh, M. and Hosseini, K., 2023(b). Application of soft computing techniques to estimate the scouring depth formed by crossing jets. Water Science and Technology, 87(8), pp.1853-1865. doi:10.2166/wst.2023.097
 
15-               Mirzaee, R., Mousavi, F., Hosseini, K. and Choobi, F., 2023(a). Effect of moisture content and angle of impact of symmetric crossing jets on scour of cohesive bed. In: 22nd Iranian Hydraulics Conference. Maragheh, East Azerbaijan, Iran.
 
16-               Naini, S., Karami, H. and Hosseini, K., 2022. Effect of sediment gradation on scour by symmetric crossing jets: An experimental investigation. Water Supply, 22(11), pp.8211-8232. doi:10.2166/ws.2022.379
 
17-               Pagliara, S., Amidei, M. and Hager, W.H., 2008. Hydraulics of 3D plunge pool scour. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(9), pp.1275-1284. 134:9(1275). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429.
 
18-               Pagliara, S., Hager, W.H. and Minor, H.E., 2006. Hydraulics of plane plunge pool scour. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 132(5), pp.450-461. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-94291
 
19-               Pagliara, S., Palermo, M. and Carnacina, I., 2011. Scour process due to symmetric dam spillways crossing jets. International Journal of River Basin Management, 9(1), pp.31-42. doi:10.1080/15715124.2011.552918
 
20-               Pagliara, S., Palermo, M. and Roy, D., 2012. Stilling basin erosion due to vertical crossing jets. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 50(3), pp.290-297. doi:10.1080/00221686.2012.669201
 
21-               Singh, U.K. and Ahmad, Z., 2019. Transport rate and bed profile computations for clay–silt–gravel mixture. Environmental Earth Sciences, 78(15), pp.1-20. doi:10.1007/s12665-019-8475-4
 
22-               Xue, W.Y., Huai, W.X. and Qian, Z.D., 2010. Numerical simulation of sediment erosion by submerged plane turbulent jets. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Series B, 22(5), pp.593-598. doi:10.1016/S1001-6058(09)60094-7
 
23- Zhang, L. and Wang, Y., 2024. Numerical simulation of scour hole development under submerged jets on cohesive sediment beds. Water Resources Research, 60(4), pp.567-582.doi:10.1029/2023WR035678 
 

  • Receive Date 08 March 2025
  • Accept Date 18 May 2025
  • Publish Date 22 June 2025