Iranian Water Research Journal

Iranian Water Research Journal

Simulation andinvestigation of factors affecting flow behavior in a tube with a porous wall

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Mechanical Engineering of Biosystem, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystem, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.
3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
Abstract
Introduction:
Porous media, as systems with special properties, consist of porous structures that play an important role in many industrial and natural processes such as filtration, material separation, and fluid transport. Due to their specific physical properties, such as porosity and permeability, these media can exhibit interesting and unpredictable behaviors. Therefore, a detailed understanding of the fluid flow behavior in these media not only helps to improve existing processes, but can also lead to the optimal design of new and more efficient systems. For this reason, accurate simulation and analysis of the flow behavior in porous-walled tubes is of great importance. The main objective of this research was to investigate the effect of various factors on the flow of fluid through a porous-walled tube. This study sought to clarify the flow-related processes in these systems by analyzing the data and results obtained from numerical simulations and to reach reliable results regarding the optimization of tube design and its applications. Also, this research attempts to provide solutions to optimize the performance of filtration and fluid transfer systems.
Methods:
In this study, the governing equations for flow in porous media, including the continuity equations, Navier-Stokes, and Darcy's law, were introduced. The continuity and momentum equations were thoroughly defined mathematically, along with a detailed examination of boundary conditions and the properties of the fluid and porous media, such as geometry and technical parameters. Fluid flow in a tube with a porous wall was simulated numerically using ANSYS Fluent 2021 software. A tube with a diameter of 2.4 cm and a length of 120 cm was selected, with boundary conditions set for an axial Reynolds number of 500, indicating a transitional flow regime. Air was modeled as the fluid, characterized by a density of 1.29 kg/m³ and a dynamic viscosity of 1.87 × 10⁻⁵ Pascal seconds. The porous medium in the tube wall was designed to be 2 mm thick, with a permeability of 1.85 × 1017 m², based on findings from previous research. A comprehensive mesh convergence analysis was conducted to ensure the accuracy of the simulation results, leading to a selection of 203150 elements that provided an optimal balance between the results accuracy and the computational time required. The study compared flow velocity parameters at two different Reynolds numbers, investigating the effect of wall seepage on flow by varying the porous medium Reynolds number (Rew) from0 to 0.1. The axial Reynolds number (Re) was also used as a key criterion to describe flow behavior within the tube. The results were analyzed to understand the influence of porosity, thickness, and tube length on flow velocity. Furthermore, the simulation outcomes were compared with data from previous studies to validate the findings and enhance understanding of flow behavior in porous media.

Results:
The results obtained revealed that the Reynolds number had a significant effect on the flow performance in the porous tube. For example, when the Reynolds number associated with fluid seepage through the porous wall was equal to zero, the velocity profile of the flow through the tube showed good agreement with the data in the study of Belhouideg (2017). Also, at a Reynolds number of 0.1, the difference between the simulation results and the reference data was only 0.03%, which indicated the high accuracy of the simulation and proper validation of the results. The study of the effects of different tube wall thicknesses, porosity, and tube length on the velocity profile showed that the wall thickness and the application of different porosities from 0.2 to 0.8 had no significant effect on the fluid flow behavior. In contrast, with the lengthening in tube from 0.6 to 2.4 m, the difference in flow velocity between the regions close to the wall and the tube axis decreased as well as the overall flow velocity. The changes in the axial velocity of the flow were analyses for different Reynolds numbers in the radial direction. In the impermeable state, the velocity at the center of the tube was equal to the initial velocity, whereas in the presence of a porous medium, the flow penetration led to the creation of a compensatory force that prevented a sharp drop in velocity. This research also showed that in tu especially its length bes with porous walls, the flow seepage from the wall reduced in the velocity drop, which is clearly evident in comparison with impermeable tubes. The obtained results also emphasized the effect of wall thickness and porosity on the velocity profile and showed that these parameters did not have a significant effect under certain conditions. In addition, the results of the research indicated that the effect of the Reynolds number and the physical characteristics of the tube, especially its length, were factors affecting the behavior of the fluid flow in tubes with porous walls. So that an increase in the tube length leads to a decrease in the flow penetration velocity in the porous wall.
This research clearly shows that the Reynolds number and the physical properties of the tube, especially its length, are factors affecting the fluid flow behavior in porous-walled tubes. The results of this research can help optimize filtration systems and design optimal tubes in industrial and engineering applications. These results can be used as a basis for future studies in the field of design and optimization of fluid transport and filtration systems in porous media. Finally, the importance of this research in improving processes related to material separation and designing more efficient systems is demonstrated. Also, it can be concluded that improving simulation methods and further investigating flow behavior under different conditions can lead to a deeper understanding of flow processes in porous-walled tubes and ultimately help to promote science and technology in this field.
Keywords

1.     Belhouideg, S. and Lagache, M., 2015. Experimental Determination of the Mechanical Behaviour of Compacted Exfoliated Vermiculite. Journal of Strain, 51, 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/str.12125 
 
2.     Bense, V. F, Gleeson, T., Loveless, S. E., Bour, O. and Scibek, J., 2013. Fault Zone Hydrogeology. Journal of Earth-Science Reviews, 127, 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.09.008
 
3.     Kamar, I., Sattari, M., Mohammadi, A. H. and Ramjugernath, D., 2015. Reliable Method for the Determination of Surfactant Retention In Porous Media During Chemical Flooding Oil Recovery. Fuel, 158, 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.013
 
4.     Vial, D. and Doussau, G., 2003a. Water treatment by ultrafiltration: Application to drinking water and wastewater. Journal of Membrane Science, 213(1-2), PP. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1994.0631
 
5.     Bui, K., Dick, R., Moulin, G. and Galzy, P., 1998. Partial Concentration of Red Wine by Reverse Osmosis. Journal of Food Science, 53, 647-648.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb07776.x
 
6.     Peydayesh, M., Mohammadi, T. and Bakhtiari O., 2018. Effective treatment of dye wastewater via positively charged TETA-MWCNT/PES hybrid nanofiltration membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 194, 488-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.11.070
 
7.     Hermans, S., Mariën, H., Goethem, C. V. and Vankelecom, I. F., 2015. Recent developments in thin film (nano) composite membranes for solvent resistant nanofiltration. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 8, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2015.01.009
 
8.     Liu, J., Ju, Y., Zhang, Y. and Gong, W., 2019. Preferential paths of airwater two-phase flow in porous structures with special consideration of channel thickness effects. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52569-9
 
9.     Bansal, S., von Arnim, V., Stegmaier, T. and Planck, H., 2011. Effect of fibrous filter properties on the oil-in-water-emulsion separation and filtration performance. Journal of Hazardous materials, 190(1-3), 45-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.134
 
10. Sussman, N. L., Gislason, G. T., Conlin, C. A. and Kelly, J. H., 1994. The Hepatix Extracorporeal Liver Assist Device: Initial Clinical Experience. Artificial Organs, 18, PP. 390-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.1994.tb02221.x
 
11. Moussy, Y., 2000. Bioartificial kidney, II, A Convective Flow Model of a Hollow Fiber Bioartificial Renal tubule, Journal of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 68, 153. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0290 (20000420)68:2<153::aid-bit4>3.3.co;2-b
 
12. Moussy, Y., 2003. Convective Flow Through a Hollow Fiber Bioartificial Liver. Journal of Artificial Organs, 27, 1041-1049. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1594.2003.07074.x
 
13. Vial, D. and Doussau, G., 2003b. The Use of Microfiltration Membranes for Seawater Pre-treatment Prior to Reverse Osmosis Membranes. Journal of Desalination, 153, 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-9164(02)01115-3
 
14. Bui, K., Dickey, M. D., and Girard F., 1994. Applications of porous media in food and beverage processing. Journal of Food Engineering, 22(1-4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2674-2_214
 
15. Girard, B. and Fukumoto, L. R., 2000. Membrane Processing of Fruit Juices and Beverages: A Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 40, 91-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690091189293
 
16. Berman A. S., 1953. Laminar Flow in Channels with Porous Walls. Journal of Applied Physics, 24. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1721476
 
17. Yuan, S. W. and Finkelstein, A. B., 1956. Laminar flow with injection and suction through a porous wall. Trans ASME, 78, 719-724. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4013794
 
18. Brady, J. F., 1984. Flow development in a porous channel and tube. Physics of Fluids, 27, 1061-1067. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.864735
 
19. Schmitz, P. and Prat, M., 1995. 3-D Laminar stationary flow over a porous surface with suction: Description at pore level. AIChE Journal, 41, 2212-2226. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690411005
 
20. Moussy, Y. and Snider, A. D., 2009. Laminar flow over pipes with injection and suction through the porous wall at low Reynolds number. Journal of Membrane Science, 327, 104-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.018
 
21. Blatt, W. F., Dravid, A., Michaels, A. S. and Nelson, L., 1970. Solute Polarization and Cake Formation in Membrane Ultrafiltration: Causes, Consequences and Control Techniques. Membrane Science and Technology. Springer. 246p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1851-4_4
 
22. Galowin, L. S., Fletcher, L. S. and Santis, M. J., 1974. Investigation of laminar flow in a porous pipe with variable wall suction, AIAA Journal, 12, 1585-1589. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.49549
 
23. Belfort, G., 1984. Fluid mechanics in membrane filtration: Recent developments. Journal of Membrane Science, 40, 123-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(89)89001-5
 
24. Blunt, M., King, M. J. and Scher, H., 1992. Simulation and theory of two-phase flow in porous media. Physical review letters, 46, 7680-7686. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.46.7680
 
25. Nassehi, V., 1998. Modelling of combined Navier-Stokes and Darcy flows in crossflow membrane filtration. Chemical Engineering Science, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(97)00443-0
 
26. Gharibi, F. and Ashrafizaadeh, M., 2020. Darcy and inertial fluid flow simulations in porous media using the non-orthogonal central moments lattice Boltzmann method. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 194, 107572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107572
 
27. Belhouideg, S., 2017. Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Fluid Flow in a Porous Tube with Parietal Suction. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 10(9), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.12988/ces.2017.7330
 
28. Shames, I. H., 2017. Mechanics of Fluid. 5th edition. CRC Press.
 
29. Bear, J., 2013. A review of Darcy,s Low and it,s application in porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 98(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-013-0170-x
 
30. Fetter, C. W., 2018. Applied Hydrogeology (4th ed.). Waveland Press. Long Grove. Illinois, 616 p.
 
31. Hazen, A., 1892. Some physical properties of sands and gravels, with special reference to their use in filtration. Massachusetts State Board of Health. Annual Report, 24, 539-556. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674600485.c25
 
32. Belhouideg, S., 2017. Study of water percolation in porous tubes. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 65(3), 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2017-0030
 
33. Belhouideg, S., and Lagache, M., 2014. Prediction of the effective permeability coefficient in random porous media using the finite element method. Journal of Porous Media, 17, 819-830. https://doi.org/10.1615/jpormedia.v17.i9.60
 
34. White, F. M., 2011. Fluid Mechanics, 7th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 345p.
 
35. Fox, R.W., McDonald, A. T. and Pritchard, P.J., 2015. Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 9th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, PP .290.
 
36. Kaviany, M., 1995. Principles of Heat Transfer in Porous Media. New York, NY, USA: Springer. 150 p.
 

  • Receive Date 13 December 2024
  • Accept Date 01 March 2025
  • Publish Date 21 March 2025